fix(drive) locks + 1.7.1

This commit is contained in:
nvrl committed 2026-08-16 20:41:03 +02:00
1 parent 433e206203
commit d03d3eac3f
13 files changed
+701 -51

No files matched your search

+111
View File
@@ -3545,3 +3545,114 @@ fn a_read_does_not_wait_for_the_write_connection() {
let _ = std::fs::remove_file(&path);
let _ = std::fs::remove_file(format!("{}.lock", path.display()));
}
/// §5: the drain is several workers over one queue, and the claim column is the
/// only thing keeping them off each other's work. Two properties matter — no
/// row is ever handed to two workers, and no *node* is ever worked by two
/// workers even though its ops are separate rows.
#[test]
fn a_claimed_op_is_invisible_to_every_other_worker() {
let db = Db::open_in_memory().unwrap();
let root = uid("root").to_string();
for i in 0..3 {
db.enqueue_op(&bulk_op(i, &root)).unwrap();
}
let first = db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().expect("an op is due");
let second = db
.claim_next_due_op(10)
.unwrap()
.expect("another op is due");
let third = db
.claim_next_due_op(10)
.unwrap()
.expect("a third op is due");
assert!(
db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().is_none(),
"a fourth claim must find nothing left: every queued op is taken"
);
let mut ids = [first.id, second.id, third.id];
ids.sort_unstable();
assert_eq!(
ids,
[1, 2, 3],
"each worker must get a distinct row, oldest first"
);
// Releasing puts one back, and it is the one that comes out next.
db.release_op_claim(second.id).unwrap();
let again = db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().expect("the released op");
assert_eq!(again.id, second.id);
}
#[test]
fn two_workers_never_share_a_node() {
let db = Db::open_in_memory().unwrap();
let root = uid("root").to_string();
// Two ops of different kinds against one node — a queued rename and a
// queued revision, which is an ordinary `mv` plus a save.
let mut revision = bulk_op(0, &root);
revision.parent_uid = None;
db.enqueue_op(&revision).unwrap();
let rename = PendingOp {
kind: OP_RENAME.to_string(),
parent_uid: Some(root.clone()),
blob_path: None,
meta_json: None,
..bulk_op(0, &root)
};
db.enqueue_op(&rename).unwrap();
let claimed = db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().expect("an op is due");
assert_eq!(claimed.kind, OP_REVISION, "the older op goes first");
assert!(
db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().is_none(),
"the second op targets the same node, so it must wait for the first: \
two workers on one uid would race over its staged blob and land its \
changes out of order"
);
db.release_op_claim(claimed.id).unwrap();
db.delete_op(claimed.id).unwrap();
assert_eq!(
db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().map(|o| o.kind),
Some(OP_RENAME.to_string()),
"once the revision retires, the rename is claimable"
);
}
#[test]
fn claims_do_not_survive_the_process_that_took_them() {
let db = Db::open_in_memory().unwrap();
let root = uid("root").to_string();
for i in 0..2 {
db.enqueue_op(&bulk_op(i, &root)).unwrap();
}
db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().unwrap();
db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().unwrap();
assert!(db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().is_none());
// What `Db::open` does after the single-writer lock says the previous run
// is gone. Without it those ops are invisible to every worker forever.
assert_eq!(db.clear_op_claims().unwrap(), 2);
assert!(
db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().is_some(),
"a crashed run's claims must not park its queue"
);
}
#[test]
fn an_idle_worker_does_not_wait_on_an_op_another_worker_has() {
let db = Db::open_in_memory().unwrap();
let root = uid("root").to_string();
db.enqueue_op(&bulk_op(0, &root)).unwrap();
assert_eq!(db.earliest_due_at().unwrap(), Some(0));
db.claim_next_due_op(10).unwrap().unwrap();
assert_eq!(
db.earliest_due_at().unwrap(),
None,
"an op somebody else is draining is not work this worker is waiting for"
);
}